![]() However, by examining this second table that provides raw data, we notice that the first chicane partially skews the results. straight-line speed Source: FUnoanalisitecnica As speeds increase, the gain increases by half a percentage point, specifically when exceeding 300km/h. The story changes in the straights, where the only car to gain is the one conceived in Maranello. In terms of speed, we see that the SF-23 has a baseline deficit of 3.7km/h in slower corners and 4.4km/h in medium-speed corners. We notice that in turns below 100km/h, Charles Leclerc loses 5.32% in percentage terms, while in medium-speed corners, the accumulated gap is smaller, at 3.5%. High-speed corners, not present in Montreal, are missing, as explained by F1 experts Alessandro Arcari and Niccoló Arnerich for FUnoanalisitecnica. In the previous table, we distinguished between low-speed corner (<100km/h) and medium-speed corners(100it is not a track where we find many pure traction zones. However, it is also important to note that in Montreal, the major stress on the tires is longitudinal, while the lateral forces remain relatively low. Overall, the performance delta between the two cars amounts to over half a second.Īs mentioned, tire management in Ferrari seems to have improved, with the rear of the car no longer going into trouble as quickly. However, at the last chicane, where the famous and feared âWall of Championsâ stands, Lewis widens the gap again by one and a half tenths. On the following straight, after Turn 10, the two cars approach the section differently, and the Monegasque driver recovers approximately two tenths in pure speed. Therefore, from the apex onward, the Ferrari tends to lose most of the valuable time. In general, we can assert that in braking/entry, the red car manages to gain something, but this advantage disappears during the exit phase. The other significant part of the gap accumulates during the change of direction between Turns 8 and 9, where the SF-23 is slower by a notable three tenths compared to the W14. At the next chicane, Charles pays another price, losing an additional 50 milliseconds, bringing the gap to four tenths at the halfway point of the track. Lewis Hamilton produces superior traction towards Turn 5, a corner that is taken flat out. compare fastest lap: Leclerc vs Hamilton â Gp Canada 2023. This delta remains stable during the straight leading to the second chicane, which is taken at a higher speed. Only in Turn 2, the gap hovers around a tenth of a second. At the first braking point, Turn 16, initially, it gains some advantage, but already from the next change of direction, it starts to lose. Studying the overall graph, letâs first try to understand where the red car loses ground during the evolution of the lap. Click here for the best offers to support Charles and Carlos from the track! Show your support for Scuderia Ferrari with official merchandise collection! Click here to enter the F1 online Store and shop securely! And also get your F1 tickets for every race with VIP hospitality and unparalleled insider access. Meanwhile, the seven-time world champion from Mercedes was circulating with a used set of Medium tires that he would later change a few laps ahead. The two timing comparisons under scrutiny occur at the forty-seventh lap, in which both drivers set their fastest laps.Ä«ased on this idea, we underline how the Monegasque driver stopped the clock in his fastest attempt using a brand-new set of Hard tires. By doing so, the SF-23 completed one of the longest stints on the yellow-banded Pirelli tires, which have a performance similar to the Soft compound.Ä«efore observing the telemetry, we must first make an important consideration for the sake of reasoning. For this reason, the red cars were able to adopt a âreverse strategyâ by making one less pit stop. ![]() In general, the degradation of the Ferrari has decreased. ![]() By examining the fastest laps in the race of Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc, we notice certain aspects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |